
A few of our award-winning FGM correspondents just got back from the "First Annual" Penn Basketball Town Hall meeting. It was a pleasant affair, and just a little kinder than your standard Comedy Central roast. Contrary to inital reports, no blood was shed on either side and both sides came out declaring themselves the victor.
In truth, the event was a great way for Miller, Bilsky, and the alumni/donors to interact. Held in the swanky Inn at Penn, the check-in desk was professional, the Penn Athletics managers were out in force, and the breakfast spread was superb. But I digress. I guess people might be more interested in the actual reason for the "town hall."
Glen Miller. Seemed a little hesitant at first facing the wolves, but not as tentative as the audience, who seemed terrified to actually harp their grievings in front of The Man himself. But once the first questions got the ball rolling, the old alumni in attendance certainly wrought their thunder on Miller and AD Steve Bilsky.
There seems to be a bit of a generational gap between the 45 or so alumni there and the 5 students there. Like at least 30 years or so...hmmm....1979 Final Four? Certainly most of people there had just been weaned off of the glory years and were noticeably perturbed by the current state of the program. Not sure what the minimum donation was to get in the door, but I recognized many of the notable names on the tags in the room.
The most contentious discussions at the forum did not concern Miller at all. Bilsky had to answer angry attendees on the bad microphones at the event, technology issues regarding online game streaming, University support of the program, and our favorite topic, falling student attendance. Here are some of the highlights of this morning's town hall, if you weren't able to go:
IntroductionApparently Miller is a golfing man. He remarked on the awesome weather to the crowd, much like a awkward spouse would do after a fight the previous night. And awkward it was. Miller told the crowd that he "shared their disappointment," but said that "its behind us."
RecruitingThe first question was a softball one, asking about the current recruiting class. Miller named three verbal commits,
Carson Sullivan,
Brian Fitzpatrick, and
Malcolm Washington. With Sullivan, Miller said he was excited that Carson had the potential to give Rosen some help next year so that he wouldn't have to go a full 40 minutes. Miller regarded Washington as a "preferred walk-on." Malcolm was apparently set on going to Penn anyways, and Coach said he was excited about the 5-9 "fireball" with "great work ethic and passion." Miller remarked that it's always difficult to see how a guy pans out, and was intrigued by his potential. Finally, he said that he was continuing to bring recruits and potential transfers to campus, and specifically looking for a "front-court player" to round out a "solid" class.
Further questions were on the state of local ties with Philly and NYC area high schools and which schools exactly compete with Penn on the recruiting trail. Regarding criticism that the program had weakened ties with local area high schools, Miller maintained that ties have never been stronger. Miller hinted that they were working to get a couple of local area players for next year's class who had "first team" All-Ivy potential. On the second question, Miller revealed that Carson Sullivan had selected Penn ED in spite of a big effort from Princeton, who Coach said targeted Sullivan as their "top recruit." Overall, the program viewed Harvard as their most intense recruiting rival in the Ivys, but that good academic schools that gave scholarships like Stanford, Vanderbilt, Notre Dame, and Rutgers presented a recruiting challenge overall and had stolen more than a few recruits in the past. This wasn't a surprise. Stupid scholarships.
SchedulingMiller confirmed non-conference dates at Penn State, with Lafayette, and with Monmouth next season, in addition to the Ivy and Big 5 slates. There will be no Christmas tournament next year. Miller said that three non-conference slots were still being negotiated, including a potential date with a "high major" team. Could Penn be hitting Tobacco Road again?
Next Season's ExpectationsMiller stated that the goals would not change. Ivy championships, NCAA berth, winning in the NCAA tournament. And he said those goals were "realistic," especially given that the team would be playing with a "chip on its shoulder." No word on whether that "chip" would inspire better defensive rotation against Cornell.
In a follow-up question, Miller directly rebutted a question in the audience, who asked him about his comments on a "lack of senior leadership" earlier in the season. He claimed that it was a misquote and that Votel, Egee, Lewis, and Cohen had done a great job in a tough season.
Transfers During the Past SeasonA DP guy asked Miller a question about Harrison Gaines'
comments after his transfer decision at the end of the season. Miller was disappointed that Gaines felt like Penn was not a "good fit." He referred back to the attempts to play both Gaines and Rosen at the same time on the floor, but that Zack was the natural PG, and Gaines "played better as the 2." Miller concluded that the program uses their own evaluation and cultivation systems to see which recruits will be good fits for the program and works at length to build a strong relationship with each player. That evaluation system will obviously be looked at this offseason.
Overall, Miller cautioned the crowd to look at the pattern of transfers at other schools, naming both Ivy schools and large national programs.
Does the University administration do enough for the program?This question was posed by Mr. Belcore, and inspired the most intriguing back-and-forth of the entire session. As a program parent, Mr. Belcore was concerned that the administration did not do enough to accomodate the special needs of the players, specifically the desire to allow athletes to have scheduling priority for classes to fit their training schedules. Steve Bilsky responded that the Ivy League's mantra since the start has been that "students need to be like other students." Mr. Belcore responded by asserting that the University as a whole would have to offer "academic incentives" to entice top pro-ready recruits to attend the school, so that Penn would have a chance of becoming a national program again and "beating North Carolina." Another member of the audience promptly remarked that it would good to just beat Penn State, Columbia, and Princeton in a year.
As an observer, I was happy to see Bilsky take a strong stance during this section of the Q&A. Bilsky maintained that he felt that the strength of the athletic program/facilities and that the marquee reputation of the University would be enough to attract quality talent to the program. I personally agreed with Bilsky. While I would hope that athletes' specific needs are addressed, I don't think setting athletes apart from the student population is a necessary step. Most basketball players are not recognized by the students, and feedback from a decision to raise the athletes' needs above other students would be met with criticism from student government, DP editorials, and students in general. As a student, I was very surprised by some of the ideas thrown out by the older alumni. Times must have been different back then. Although I did take exception to Bilsky's statement that Penn Dining "is very good."
I also enjoyed the shocked murmurs from the alumni when Bilsky remarked that professors did not want to teach in the morning anymore and wanted to teach at their own preferred times. Times must really have been different back then. But I gladly take my 4:30 Marketing 101 section.
Student Support (or lack of it)Miller said the key to getting the students back was that "everyone wants to see a winner." He said an "excited brand of basketball" would allow the Palestra to compete with the myriad of student entertainment options in Philly. Bilsky added that student attendance issues are facing every school and sport, except for
SEC football.
The entire crowd seemed to be very concerned especially about the empty Red and Blue Crew sections during this past season.